Dr.Ningamma Betsur, Associate Professor,
Mysore University was the Resource Person for the thematic session on quality
concerns in Education, at the National Seminar organized on National
Education Day (11 November 2011) by the Department of Education, University of
Calicut. During the lecture, the speaker attempted to explore several
dimensions of quality. The concept of quality she opined is :
·
inherently multidimensional.
·
linked to results and partly to objectives and components that intervene
to reach these results.
·
values with time, need, interests and convictions of various groups and
people.
·
not homogenous at any given time and the heterogeneity of quality is
associated with objective and subjective considerations.
Other observations made include:
·
In India for instance, we may place moral values at the top while assessing quality...not perhaps in
other countries.
·
Earlier quality education for women in India meant making them come out
of their homes and undergo a regular and
useful course of study in an educational institution. Today, it focuses on
women empowerment.
·
It is a pity that after getting
eighty percent marks for the Pre-University examination, on failing to get an
admission for the MBBS course, students
commit suicide. It is high time our
education empowered our children to
accept failure.
·
If quality is our prime concern, we ought to develop the ability in our students to ask critical questions. But what normally
happens is that in our classes in colleges, teachers lecture where information from the teacher’s notes is
transferred to the student’s notes with real information entering either head!
During her lecture, Dr. Ningamma introduced a
few anecdotes to illustrate her
arguments. Given below are a few:
·
Once while food was being served during a marriage function
a relative of a civil engineer noticed that the sambar just poured was running down the banana leaf.
At once he asked the engineer: “What
kind of Civil Engineer are you who cannot even manage the flow of sambar!” . Can this failure be
attributed to the kind of education we are imparting in our engineering
colleges? It is here that issues related to quality should come up for
discussion.
·
A student once inquired why he is denied the privilege of not using a
chit with the main points, during the
university examination, when many Professors who engage classes for them, use a chit with the
main points jotted down!
·
One great advantage of the setting up of NAAC in India is that many
college buildings which had not received a coating of paint for decades have
now adorned a charming look.
Dr. Ningamma during her lecture referred to
the communiqué of the World Conference
on Higher Education 2009 “Quality
criteria must reflect the overall objectives of higher education, notably the
aim of cultivating in students critical and independent thought and the
capacity of learning throughout life. They should encourage innovation and
diversity”. [UNESCO (2009) 2009 World Conference on Higher Education : The New
Dynamics of Higher education and research for Societal Change and development:
Communiqué. Author, Paris. p.4]
After the presentation, when the audience
were invited to join the deliberations, I made the following
observation: “Well..., the UNESCO communiqué highlights the cognitive domain... what about
the other domains/ dimensions?...We in India normally go into raptures when we
make a reference to education of the Vedic age, particularly the Gurukula
System of Education...but did we have a
NAAC then?”
A front
page news item in the Malayalam Daily, Kerala
Kaumudi dated 13 November 2011
reads: Ninety percent of the students in
the self financing engineering colleges in Kerala failed to clear their final
examination!
Any comments dear reader?